🔗 Share this article

Alison Gaffney and Andy Hinde faced heartbreaking news in 2018 when their toddler Fraser was confirmed to have a uncommon form of leukaemia.

24 months of demanding therapies came next, involving drug treatments, targeted radiation, and biological therapies before a bone marrow procedure. The young boy, by age three, made a “miraculous recovery” from the operation, with doctors confirming the disease in recovery.

It was at this point that Alison, aged thirty-six, began seeking causes. She constantly recalled observations made by medical professionals at the time of her child's illness. “It keeps us up at night wondering how our son got his illness,” a doctor had shared with her.

“It keeps us up at night wondering how Fraser got his illness,” a specialist had shared with her.

Historical Context

The improper handling of enormous amounts of toxic materials after the shutdown of a major industrial facility in this community in 1979 had “long been recognized,” said Alison. A legal proceeding associated the council’s negligent clean-up of the site to a string of congenital abnormalities in town residents during the previous decades.

Gradually, the concerned mother started to associate the circumstances to her own. “[His illness] is not inherited,” she said. “What could cause this? … It has to be down to the community. So many children [with] the disease.

“Everybody in this town knows someone who’s got a child [with] illness. That’s not normal.”

Community Action

The parents started to connect with additional households in the town with parallel situations – among them some of the mother's ex-school friends at a local school – and the organization began gathering thorough information on those involved. They now head a initiative advocating for about 130 families with instances of childhood cancer going back to 1988.

The collective has been calling on the town council to research any links between cases of youth disease in the town and the closure of the plant. Soon, medical experts are expected to release their analysis of whether the area has had a disproportionate number of occurrences of childhood cancer for its population of 70,000.

“Our only goal is to attempt to safeguard subsequent residents so they can avoid the hardship that we've experienced,” said the mother.

Historical Context

The ruling in the court proceeding acknowledged that, between a fourteen-year period, enormous amounts of hazardous waste from the manufacturing site were relocated “typically” from the one area to a designated site in the opposite end – with “large quantities” of toxic waste carried and deposited on public roads and “considerable amounts” of airborne particles generated by the reclamation.

However, it also cited reports from the Environment Agency in 1997 that found collections of hazardous waste that had been left at this location were later extracted in “large quantities”.

Growing Suspicions

Alison maintains toxic substances was not only dumped at the main disposal area but in other parts of the municipality. Lately, she welcomed a “significant progress” after municipal government said it would examine soil that could be polluted and research where contaminated substances was dumped.

The mother said council staff acknowledged in the meeting that they did not know where the areas of toxic materials could be. “They said: ‘We're uncertain where these areas are. Documentation is missing, there's no data available.’”

Local Backing

The official statement was also embraced by a community member, a school staff member at a elementary institution, whose school-aged girl, her daughter, was found to have leukaemia in June this year.

“I was forced to trim my nine-year-old daughter's hair because her locks was falling out from the drugs she had to use to eliminate her disease. Therefore it’s in the community's concern, it’s in her daughter's welfare [for the council] to reveal that knowledge,” she explained.

“Countless people in the area that have been found to have pediatric illness and I just feel it’s cannot be dismissed – it demands examination. This isn't typical.”

Individual Accounts

Meg Lyons, in her early thirties, who has a professional career and now lives in London, said families merited “absolute honesty and clarity” from the government.

Her 11-year-old sister, Eve, passed away on in recent years after being confirmed to have a specific illness at the age of nine. Her sister, who collected money for health organizations, was “among the adorable, funniest and caring” persons, she said.

Her parent remembers the consequence of the shutdown of the manufacturing site on the town, the woman stated. “She said you were unable to place your fingers in before you because [of] the colored dust.”

“This has been going on since I was approximately about my youth. It's too long and it is irresponsibility toward the community members.”

Past Associations

A relative, a community member, was part of multiple families involved in the 2009 claim against the previous administration after her baby was diagnosed with a foot condition. Her spouse, her partner, was among the vehicle operators participating in transporting materials from the industrial site. Their situation was portrayed in a recent series, and showed the mother cleaning the dust from her partner's pants.

Gaffney said the campaign group has been reached out to by individuals with information who were involved in the placement of substances in the town.